Outputs, outcomes, and efficacy

Project outputs

Key Performance Indicators

Tangible, measurable outputs that reflect what a project delivers. KPIs track the immediate results of an AI initiative: tools implemented, actions taken, services improved.

Mission outcomes

Objectives & Key Results

Mission-aligned outcomes: what changes for students, faculty, or the institution. OKRs connect AI implementation to strategic goals like student success, equity, research excellence, or operational transformation.

AI performance

Efficacy

Evidence that the AI does what it claims, accurately and fairly across groups, and that it, rather than other factors, produced the change. Efficacy is what makes KPIs and OKRs trustworthy.

  1. Problem or opportunityWhy act at all
  2. ContributionHow the AI helps
  3. OutputsMeasured by KPIs
  4. EfficacyAccuracy, fairness, attribution
  5. OutcomesMeasured by OKRs
  6. MissionStudent success, equity, research, operations
KPIs show the project delivered; OKRs show the institution gained. Efficacy is the link between them: it tests whether the AI performed as intended and whether it, not something else, produced the outcome.

Exit criteria & re-review triggers

Decide in advance what would make you pause or stop, and what would send an approved initiative back for re-scoring. Retiring a tool should be a planned outcome, not an afterthought.

Set at Plan

Exit criteria

  • An efficacy measure stays below its floor after a set period (e.g., precision under 70% after six weeks).
  • Performance gaps across groups exceed the agreed tolerance.
  • A privacy, security, or safety incident occurs.
  • KPIs or adoption miss target by a set margin at the mid-pilot check.
  • Costs exceed budget, or ongoing funding is not secured.
Any time after approval

Re-review triggers

  • The vendor changes the model, terms, or data practices.
  • New data types are added, or the AI's role in decisions grows.
  • Use expands to a new population, unit, or scale.
  • A contract comes up for renewal.
  • A significant complaint, incident, or audit finding.
  • Scheduled: at least annually for High and Critical initiatives.

Record both in the scorer's Plan step. A re-review starts again at Score with the current evidence.

Six planning questions

Every initiative answers the same six questions (three about the mission, three about the project) plus an efficacy check that ties them together. Draft them at intake; finalize them after selection.

Mission outcomes: what the institution gainsProject outputs: what the project delivers
What problem or opportunity?How will the project contribute?
What will be the outcome(s)?What will the project produce or enable?
How will you know the outcomes have been realized? → OKRsHow will you know the outputs have been achieved? → KPIs

Efficacy check. How will you know the AI is working as intended? Name how you'll measure accuracy and error rates, whether performance holds across groups, and how you'll attribute outcomes to the AI (for example, a comparison group or a staged rollout) rather than to other changes made at the same time.

Teaching & Learning

Worked example: AI-driven early warning system for at-risk students

An AI system that analyzes student data (e.g., grades, attendance) to identify at-risk students and recommend interventions, aiming to improve retention and academic success.

1 · Score

DimensionScoreReasoning

Total 17: High  Strong alignment and clear operational potential, with notable risks around data governance, financial sustainability, and stakeholder trust. Recommended only with clear ethical oversight, a well-defined budget and support infrastructure, transparent communication with stakeholders, and ongoing monitoring.

2 · Plan

Mission outcomes
Problem
Students at risk of failing courses often go unnoticed, leading to higher dropout rates.
Outcome
Improved student retention and academic success, supporting equitable education.
Objective
Enhance student retention through early AI interventions.
Key result
Increase course pass rates for at-risk students by 15% within one academic year.
Key result
Reduce dropout rates by 10% by the end of the academic year.
Project outputs
Contribution
Analyzes student data (e.g., grades, attendance) to predict risk and recommend interventions.
Deliverable
An AI early warning system integrated into the learning management system.
KPI
Identifies 90% of at-risk students within the first four weeks of the semester.
KPI
Delivers intervention recommendations to 95% of identified students within 48 hours.
Efficacy
At least 80% of flagged students are confirmed at risk by advisors (precision).
Efficacy
Flag accuracy stays within 5 points across student demographic groups.
Efficacy
Retention gain is measured against a matched comparison group, not the prior year alone.

3 · Track & reflect

After the pilot, compare actuals to targets and record what the institution learned. Illustrative results:

MeasureTargetActualNotes
KPIIdentifies 90% of at-risk students within four weeks85%Close, but advisor workload slowed response.
OKRReduce dropout rates by 10%7%Improved, but needs a longer pilot.
Efficacy80% of flagged students confirmed at risk68%False positives confused advisors; threshold needs tuning.

What worked

The tool accurately flagged at-risk students; advisors liked the interface.

What didn't

Efficacy fell short: 68% precision meant false positives that confused advisors; student trust was low due to lack of communication.

Next step: iterate

Add opt-in consent and retrain advisors on interpreting flags; pilot again in the fall.

Try it with this example

Open the scorer pre-filled with the early warning system, then adjust the scores and see how the band changes.

Representative targets. The percentages and thresholds on this page are examples, not benchmarks. Set targets from your own baselines and goals.